| Home CBA.org Français |
|
Legal Profession Assistance Conference Office: 613-237-2925 x132
24hr HelpLine:
|
The Cost of Justice: A Desk Manual on Vicarious TraumaFirst Contact Criminal, Family and Immigration Law Lawyers, judges and other Court personnel, especially those working in criminal justice, child welfare and protection, immigration and family law will routinely experience parties and witnesses who have suffered trauma. Some will exhibit the symptoms of Simple or Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Often, to be effective in their various roles as legal practitioners, lawyers and judges have to be able and willing to identify Post Traumatic Stress by learning to recognize and identify PTSD reactions.Further, legal practitioners need to understand and support these individuals through the legal process. The more effective legal practitioners become in recognizing, coping with and supporting these individuals and their personal histories, the greater the risk that the legal practitioner will experience vicarious or secondary trauma. Charles R. Figley, an early pioneer in the field of Traumatic Stress Studies, stated,
Figley has defined Secondary Traumatic Stress as “the natural, consequent behaviors and emotions resulting from knowledge about a traumatizing event experienced by a significant other. It is the stress resulting from helping or wanting to help a traumatized or suffering person.” The negative effects of secondary exposure to a traumatic event are nearly identical to those of primary exposure; with the difference being that exposure to a traumatizing event experienced by one person becomes a traumatizing event for a second person. Thus, Secondary Traumatic Stress is defined as a syndrome of symptoms nearly identical to those of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, including symptoms of intrusion, avoidance and/or arousal. While the study of Secondary Traumatic Stress is a rapidly growing field, the majority of existing literature is conceptual in nature or reports only anecdotal evidence of the phenomenon. While science strives to catch-up with this anecdotal evidence, the genie is now out of the bottle for the legal profession, where a wide range of highly respected judges and lawyers have experienced severe problems from the caustic and corrosive evidence they absorb as legal practitioners. There is growing recognition in legal Bar Organizations such as Canada’s Legal Profession Assistance Conference that serious symptoms, burnout and disability are a growing concern. Direct Trauma Effects Lawyers, judges and other Court workers can come in contact with individuals who have suffered extreme trauma including past and present physical and sexual abuse, childhood neglect and emotional abuse, natural and human-caused disasters, war and military combat, as well as personal assault and a whole range of terrifying events or ordeals in which grave physical harm occurred or was threatened. The result of exposure to these traumatic events has been called Post Traumatic Stress. The continuing experience of Post Traumatic Stress is called Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in the clinical literature. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) in Toronto, Canada, provides this definition:
Some of the symptoms of PTSD have become fairly well known through stories and the media. It may be helpful, however, to review the three categories or “clusters” of responses that are associated with Post Traumatic Stress:
(see: Bridging Responses, Lori Haskell, CAMH) Experts have learned that people react to traumatic experiences in vastly different ways. Some of the responses are obvious, such as intrusive memories or panic attacks. Other responses, such as feeling numb and empty are subtle and difficult to identify. It is well known, however, that responses may continue for many years following the traumatic events, even after the responses appear to have subsided for a period. Experts have also delineated two different kinds of Post Traumatic Stress. Simple Post Traumatic Stress results from a one-time incident such as a serious accident or a violent assault. This is markedly different from the complex set of responses that follows chronic, multiple and/or ongoing traumatic events. These events can include chronic childhood abuse or prolonged experiences of assault and violence in an intimate relationship or continuing exposure to violence and personal danger. CAMH has identified three broad areas of psychological disturbance that distinguish Simple PTSD from Complex PTSD. The first area involves the types of responses or effects, which are more complex, wide-spread and persistent in Complex PTSD, due to the prolonged nature of the trauma. Secondly, the kinds of characteristic personality changes that accompany complex PTSD include difficulties with relationships and personal identity.Thirdly, the survivor’s increased vulnerability to further victimization continues both in the forms of self-harm as well as harm perpetrated by others. There are additional problems which can include:
Recognizing the signs of Post Traumatic Stress Responses The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) suggests the following physiological and psychological symptoms common to Complex PTSD: Mental Health Problems:
Impaired Sense of Self:
Relationship Difficulties:
Problems with Memory
Behavioural Expressions of Distress
Physical Problems
Treatment Theories There is now significant support for the concept that the treatment tools, options and resources that are effective in diagnosing and treating persons with PTSD are also appropriate for persons with Secondary or Vicarious Trauma symptoms. Why? Firstly, it has been established that the symptoms for both primary PTSD and for Secondary/Vicarious Trauma are the same. If so, it follows logically that the tools of diagnosis and treatment would be the same, or at least similar. Secondly, practice and treatment expertise in this area is rapidly expanding as our knowledge grows. As the tools of diagnosis and treatment have improved for PTSD, the best strategy has been to employ the same tools for other related traumas. While it is possible, and perhaps even likely, that these tools will evolve differently in the future, the best practice approach in the context of here and now is to pursue the same diagnostic and treatment tools. In our experience, a Solution-Focused Therapy will offer the best outcomes in the majority of cases. |
![]() |
Copyright © The Canadian Bar Association |